Tuesday, August 24, 2004

Why public schools should be shut down

http://www.m4radio.com/main/messageboard/191.html

Parents are laughing at the intolerance of the zero tolerance rules that have been instituted in so many public schools. Laughing, that is, unless it is their own sons who are victimized by policies that seem to lack common sense. It's a serious matter when a good child is expelled from school, suspended or sent to a detention facility to take classes with real delinquents. Here are some recent examples of how the zero tolerance hatchet is wielded in public schools.

A first-grader at Struthers Elementary School in Youngstown, Ohio, was suspended for 10 days for taking home a plastic knife from the school cafeteria in his book bag. The 6-year-old wasn't threatening anyone; he just wanted to show his mother he had learned how to spread butter on his bread.

A third-grader at O'Rourke Elementary School in Mobile, Ala., was given a five-day suspension for violating the substance abuse policy after classmates reported that he took a "purple pill." His offense was taking a multivitamin with his lunch.

At LaSalle Middle School in Greeley, Colo., three 13-year-old boys were given one-year suspensions because one of the students brought to school a key chain with a 2 1/2-inch laser pointer. The school called it a "firearm facsimile" and sent one of the boys, a good student who had never before been in trouble, to an alternative program where he is taking classes with young criminals and juvenile delinquents in "anger management," "conflict resolution" and gangs.

Four kindergartners at Wilson Elementary School in Sayreville, N.J., were suspended for three days for playing a make-believe game of cops and robbers during recess, using their fingers as guns. This case is now before the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

When seven fourth-grade boys, who had never before been in trouble, at Dry Creek Elementary School in Colorado were discovered pointing "finger guns" at each other while playing a game of soldiers and aliens during recess, the principal found them in violation of the school's zero tolerance policy. After quizzing them about whether their parents owned guns, she required them to serve a one-week detention during lunchtime, sitting in the hall where they were teased and taunted by other students.

An 8-year-old at South Elementary school in Jonesboro, Ark., was punished with detention for pointing a chicken strip at another student in the cafeteria while saying "pow, pow, pow."

A 7-year-old at the Edgewood Independent School District in San Antonio, Texas, was banished for 11 days to an "alternative school" for troubled students when he was caught bringing a pocketknife to school. For three days, he was the only first-grader at the facility among older students guilty of serious offenses.

A 12-year-old at Magoffin Middle School in El Paso, Texas, stuck out his tongue at a girl who had declined his invitation to be his girlfriend. School administrators called this sexual harassment and suspended him for three days.

When the Fred A. Anderson Elementary School in Bayboro, N.C., held a Camouflage Day, a 9-year-old proudly came in his new duck-hunting outfit.

His joy was smashed when the teacher discovered an empty shotgun shell in his pocket left over from a weekend outing with his father, and punished the straight-A student with a five-day suspension.

In Hurst, Texas, a 16-year-old honor student was expelled from high school after a security guard found a butter knife in the bed of his pickup truck parked on school grounds. The knife apparently fell out of a box of household items he and his father had transported the previous day from his grandmother's home to a local Goodwill store. School officials claimed that the butter knife was a danger to other students and placed him in a disciplinary alternative school for five days.

Two 8-year-old boys who pointed paper guns at classmates in Irvington, N.J., were charged with "making terrorist threats." A judge ultimately dismissed their case, but the incident may remain on court records until the boys are 18.

In a North Carolina preschool called Kids Gym Schoolhouse, the state evaluator deducted five points from its high rating because plastic soldiers were found in the play area. The toys were said to "reflect stereotyping and violence and can be potentially dangerous if children use them to act out violent themes."

Zero tolerance is not protecting us from terrorists or criminals. It is making good children disrespect school authorities. Almost all zero tolerance rulings punish boys. Boys are also the victims of the current fad to eliminate recess and build new schools without playgrounds. It is beginning to look as though these fads cannot be mere stupidity. By banning the games that boys like to play and preventing them from running off their excess energy during recess, this nonsense might be part of a feminist agenda to try to make little boys behave like little girls.


Public schools are evil. They violate students' most fundamental human rights. They all need to be shut down. When I read about shit like this, it makes my blood boil.

Thursday, August 19, 2004

Libertarian book about eminent domain

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/seiler1.html

Your home and business are not safe. Government can grab them at any time using anti-property redevelopment laws, paying you a pittance. Government then can give your property to a private company to develop as a mall or theme park. That’s the frightening story told in Abuse of Power: How the Government Misuses Eminent Domain, Steven Greenhut’s new book. LRC readers are familiar with his writing on this site, some of it on eminent domain...

Get this book! It supports property rights.

Friday, August 13, 2004

http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/opinion/34013.php

The use of protest as an instrument of change has been a fundamental of American life since Colonial times.

From Vietnam to the civil-rights movement to women's suffrage, we have always respected protest as a form of articulation and protected the rights of the people to express their grievances in a civil manner.

It's ironic, then, that in the same city that was host to one of the most famous protests of all time - the Boston Tea Party - our government has finally gone wrong.

I had the privilege of attending the Democratic National Convention in Boston - an event that was intended for discussion and debate of serious issues.

The inevitable protesters and demonstrators, it seems, would be welcome at such an event, to express their views and add to the debate. But they were not...


How can the government bar the media from speaking to protestors? Can't they still interview away from the whole area? This shit's gotten out of hand. People need to take this shit up to the Supreme Court. They need to sue to restore the 1st Amendment. I don't see how anything else, short of a shooting revolution will force the beaurocrats to respect our right to protest when and where ever we please.

Downloading laws: The Induce Act

http://www.reason.com/links/links081104.shtml

A few short years ago, technology enthusiasts used to claim that technology moves too fast for the law to hold it back. Those predictions turn out to be overly optimistic. In fact, lawmakers trying to put a stop to one evil are likely to create dozens more with legislation about a field they don't fully understand. Vague language designed to catch potential technological workarounds can put a stop to innovation in completely unrelated areas...

Two old phogies who probably don't even know how to turn on a computer want to tell me what to do with mine. A note to Leahy and Hatch: FUCK YOU!!!!!!